No. 13 (2017): Tema: Mobbning
Articles

Lärar-elevrelationens betydelse i antimobbningsarbetet

XML (Svenska)
  • Robert Thornberg
Robert Thornberg
Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande, Pedagogik och didaktik, Linköpings universitet
Bio
Texten Skola Tema: mobbning på svarttavla. O:t i Skola som ledsen smiley.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/venue.2001-788X.1769
Categories

Published 2017-11-21

Keywords

  • Mobbning,
  • Etik värden och normer,
  • Ledarskap i klassrummet

How to Cite

Thornberg, R. (2017). Lärar-elevrelationens betydelse i antimobbningsarbetet. Venue, (13), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3384/venue.2001-788X.1769
Copyright Notice

Abstract

Lärare som är varma, lyhörda och stödjande minskar risken för mobbning i skolan. Lärare som medvetet arbetar för att utveckla och bibehålla sådana relationer med sina elever gör skolan till en tryggare plats. Dessutom är det gynnsamt för elevernas skolprestationer.

XML (Svenska)

Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Svenska.

References

  1. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42, 76–98.

  2. Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2016). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8

    Baker, J. A., Grant, S. & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher–student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 3–15.

  3. Barboza, G. E., Schiamberg, L. B., Oehmke, J., Korzeniewski, S. J., Post, L. A. & Heraux, C. G. (2009). Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: An ecological perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 101–121.

  4. Bear, G. G., Gaskins, C., Blank, J. & Chen, F. F. (2011). Delaware school climate survey–student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 157–174.

  5. Berg, J. K. & Cornell, D. (2016). Authoritative school climate, aggression towards teacher, and teacher distress in middle school. School Psychology Quartely, 31, 122–139.

  6. Bjärehed, M., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Gini, G., & Sjögren, B. (2017). Bullying perpetration and victimization and their associations with warm student–teacher relationship, individual and collective moral disengagement, and collective efficacy in a sample of Swedish fourth grade students: A multi-level analysis. Paper presented at the World Anti-Bullying Forum, Stockholm, Sweden, May 7–9, 2017.

  7. Brottsförebyggande rådet (2009). Effekter av anti-mobbningsprogram: Vad säger forskningen? Stockholm: Fritzes.

  8. Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 419–426.

  9. Cornell, D. & Huang, F. (2016). Authorative school climate and high school student risk behavior: A cross-sectional multi-level analysis of student self-reports. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 2246–2259.

  10. Evans-Lacko, S., Takizawa, R., Brimblecombe, N., King, D., Knapp, M., Maughan, B., & Arsenault, L. (2017). Childhood bullying victimization is associated with use of mental health services over five decades: A longitudinal nationally representative cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 47, 127–135.

  11. Friends (2017). Friendsrapporten. Stockholm: PrintR.

  12. Gerlinger, J. & Wo, J. C. (2016). Preventing school bullying: Should schools prioritize an authorative school discipline approach over security measures? Journal of School Violence, 15, 133–157.

  13. Gregory, A. & Cornell, D. (2009). “Tolerating” adolescent needs: Moving beyond zero tolerance policies in high school. Theory into Practice, 48, 106–113.

  14. Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X., Sheras, P., Shih, T-H. & Huang, F. (2010). Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 483-496.

  15. Gregory, A. & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 405–427.

  16. Gregory, A. & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 455–475.

  17. Hamre, B. K. & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student–teacher relationships. I G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (red.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (s. 59–71). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

  18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, London: Routledge.

  19. Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135, e496–e509.

  20. Hughes, J. N. (2002). Authoritative teaching: Tipping the balance in favor of school versus peer effects. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 485–492.

  21. Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. Elementary School Journal, 112, 38–60.

  22. Hung, A. H., Luebbe, A. M. & Flaspohler, P. D. (2015). Measuring school climate: Factor analysis and relations to emotional problems, conduct problems, and victimization in middle school students. School Mental Health, 7, 105–119.

  23. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Elonheimo, H. (2015). Bullying by peers in childhood and effects on psychopathology, suicidality, and criminality in adulthood. Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 930–941.

  24. Konold, T., Cornell, D., Huang, F., Meyer, P., Lacey, A., Nekvasil, E., Heilbrun, A., & Shukla, K. (2014). Multilevel multi-informant structure of the authorative school climate survey. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 238–255.

  25. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2016). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01311

  26. Lereya, S. T., Copeland, W. E., Costello, E. J., & Wolke, D. (2015). Adult mental health consequences of peer bullying and maltreatment in childhood: Two cohorts in two countries. Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 524–531.

  27. Meeham, B. T., Hughes, J. N. & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher–student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development, 74, 1145–1157.

  28. Mikk, J., Krips, H., Säälik, Ü., & Kalk, K. (2016). Relationships between student perception of teacher-student relations and PISA results in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1437–1454.

  29. Pellerin, L. A. (2005). Applying Baumrind’s parenting typology to high schools: Toward a middle-range theory of authoritative socialization. Social Science Research, 34, 283–303.

  30. Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87, 345–387.

  31. Richard, J. F., Schneider, B. H. & Mallet, P. (2011). Revisiting the whole-school approach to bullying: Really looking at the whole school. School Psychology International, 33, 263–284.

  32. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L. & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.

  33. Skolverket (2011). Utvärdering av metoder mot mobbning (Rapport 353). Stockholm: Fritzes.

  34. Thornberg, R. (2011). Forskning om effektiva skolor. I R. Thornberg & K. Thelin (red.), Perspektiv på skolutveckling – med ansiktet vänt mot Europa (s. 38–66). Stockholm: Lärarförbundet, Skolverket, Sveriges skolledarförbund.

  35. Thornberg, R. (2014). Det sociala livet i skolan: Socialpsykologi för lärare (2:a uppl.). Stockholm: Liber.

  36. Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Pozzoli, T. (2017). Peer victimisation and its relation to class relational climate and class moral disengagement among children. Educational Psychology, 37, 524–536

  37. Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2017). Victim prevalence in bullying and its association with teacher–student and student–student relationships and class moral disengagement: A class-level path analysis. Research Papers in Education. Advance online publication: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02671522.2017.1302499

    Way, S. M. (2011). School discipline and disruptive classroom behavior: The moderating effects of student perceptions. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 346–375.

  38. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.

Most read articles by the same author(s)