No. 12 (2017)
Articles

Den viktiga klassrumsdialogen

XML (Svenska)
  • Karin Forslund
Karin Forslund
Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande, Pedagogik och didaktik, Linköpings universitet
Bio
Två elever löse matteproblem tillsammans.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/venue.2001-788X.17610
Categories

Published 2017-12-14

Keywords

  • Didaktik och lärande,
  • Samspel kring elever och lärande

How to Cite

Forslund, K. (2017). Den viktiga klassrumsdialogen. Venue, (12), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3384/venue.2001-788X.17610
Copyright Notice

Abstract

När elever gör grupparbeten diskuterar de främst hur arbetet i gruppen ska genomföras i stället för att diskutera uppgiften. Läraren kunde emellertid stödja elevernas diskussioner genom att ställa elaborerande frågor. Det framkommer i en nyligen genomförd studie om grupparbete.

XML (Svenska)

Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Svenska.

References

  1. Anderson, N., Chapin, S., & O’Connor, C. (2011). Classroom discussions in math: A facilitator’s guide to support professional learning of discourse and the Common Core, Grades K–6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

  2. Booth, T. (2002). Inclusion and exclusion in the city: Concepts and contexts. In P. Potts & T. Booth, Inclusion in the city (s. 1–14). London: Routledge.

  3. Forslund Frykedal, K., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2017). Student collaboration in group work – Inclusion as participation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. Doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2017.1363381

  4. Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3 & 4), s 7–55.

  5. Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), s 148–168.

  6. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary Science classroom. Language and Education, 23, 3353–369.

  7. Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C., (2014). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue (pp. 333-347). Washington DC: AERA.

  8. Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. a. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (3), s 740–764.

  9. Roseth, C. J., Johnson D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships. The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (2), s 223–246.

  10. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis.  Review of Educational Research, 79(2), s 839–911.